Skip to main content
MG01MusicGOAT Index

The short answer

Are ARASHI greater than IVE?

Yes: ARASHI leads by 0.1 points.

Quick verdict

Yes

ARASHI opens with a 0.1-point lead in the all-time score.

ARASHI

78.5

IVE

78.3

Leads

ARASHI

#545 all-time · Classification under review

All-time score78.5

ARASHI appears in the provisional Music GOAT Index. Ranking scores remain visible while biographical and classification details are under review.

Opening verdict

ARASHI

Leads by 0.1 points

IVE

#554 all-time · Classification under review

All-time score78.3

IVE appears in the provisional Music GOAT Index. Ranking scores remain visible while biographical and classification details are under review.

The plain case

Why the answer lands here

Yes: ARASHI leads by 0.1 points. The result is still open to argument: inspect the full breakdown, move the weights and see whether it survives your version of greatness.

Biggest category edge

Public attention

ARASHI

owns a 2.0-point edge here

2.0

The current leader at a Public attention weight of 20.0% is ARASHI. Changing Public attention from 20.0% to 15.7% flips the lead to IVE; all other unlocked weights are rebalanced proportionally to keep the total at 100%.

ARASHI leads IVE by 0.1 points in All-Time Ranking.

Current leader

ARASHI

Classification under review

Scoring result78.5

Wins 1 of 6 active categories · 3 level

Current margin

0.1

ARASHI leads this version.

IVE

Classification under review

Scoring result78.3

Wins 2 of 6 active categories · 3 level

The verdict

ARASHI wins this scorecard.

The edge is 0.1 points in All-Time Ranking. IVE still has category wins worth arguing below.

The strongest weighted drivers for ARASHI are Public attention (2.0 raw gap at 20% weight). 2 zero-weight context lenses are outside this verdict.

All-time list
MGI model 3.3.0July 2026 · MGI v3.3 archive6 factors counted2 context lenses

Commercial, Live are outside this verdict. Unavailable values stay N/A and are never treated as zero.

The current leader at a Public attention weight of 20.0% is ARASHI. Changing Public attention from 20.0% to 15.7% flips the lead to IVE; all other unlocked weights are rebalanced proportionally to keep the total at 100%.

Verdict logicWhy this verdict: ARASHIAll-time list: Public attention, Influence, Peak · 0.1 pts from IVE
All-time listNot counted here: Commercial + LiveUnavailable: Commercial + Live

ARASHI lands here because Public attention, Influence and Peak do most of the work in this view. Commercial and Live are unavailable until reviewed evidence exists and cannot change this verdict.

ARASHI sits 0.1 points from IVE in this scorecard; the next move would most likely come through Current and Longevity. Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed evidence exists; this verdict is not recalculated with hidden replacement values.

What helps

Public attention23.2% of this score
Public attention score91.0
Provisional evidenceDerived evidence · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Influence20.4% of this score
Influence score80.0
Provisional evidenceEditorial judgment · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Peak15.3% of this score
Peak score80.0
Provisional evidenceEditorial judgment · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 15

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

What could move it

Current and Longevity are the softest scoring factors; movement there matters most near IVE.

More checking on Public attention, Influence and Peak would improve confidence before it changes the public score.

Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed observation records pass; no alternate rank is published.

What decided it

The strongest weighted gaps

Public attention+0.4 pts

2.0 raw gap × 20% weight · edge to ARASHI

Catalog+0.1 pts

1.0 raw gap × 15% weight · edge to IVE

Current+0.1 pts

1.0 raw gap × 15% weight · edge to IVE

Active score parts

What decides this verdict

1-2 · 3 level
Public attentionLong-horizon editorial cultural-footprint judgment. The frozen v3.3 compatibility score historically used a retired short-window Wikimedia Pageviews proxy; it remains provisional until replaced in a reviewed edition.Open ARASHI profile
ARASHI91.0
IVE89.0
CatalogDepth, spread and durability of the catalog.Open IVE profile
ARASHI78.0
IVE79.0
CurrentShort-window current-interest context derived from a dated Wikimedia Pageviews observation; it is not listening, sales or artistic quality.Open IVE profile
ARASHI61.0
IVE62.0
InfluenceCurated cultural and peer influence tier.Level
ARASHI80.0
IVE80.0
LongevityActive years, persistence and legacy after the first peak.Level
ARASHI76.0
IVE76.0
PeakHow dominant the strongest era felt relative to peers.Level
ARASHI80.0
IVE80.0

Context only · zero weight

Useful context, outside this verdict

These gaps are visible for the debate, but they do not count until you raise their sliders or choose another view.

CommercialCommercial tier, sales evidence, certifications and scale.Not comparable
ARASHIN/A
IVEN/A
LiveLive/touring reputation and durable concert draw.Not comparable
ARASHIN/A
IVEN/A

Keep arguing

Best next moves

FAQ

ARASHI vs IVE questions

ARASHI or IVE: who leads the All-Time score?

Yes: ARASHI leads by 0.1 points. The published score is 78.5 vs 78.3; unavailable values remain N/A and are never scored as zero.

What is the biggest active category edge in ARASHI vs IVE?

Public attention is the biggest available active edge, with a 2.0-point gap for ARASHI.

Can the answer change?

Yes, when you change available score parts. A formula that gives positive weight to unavailable Commercial or Live evidence is rejected rather than silently rewritten.

For brands

Sponsor music arguments fans already share.

Run a clearly labeled campaign around rankings, head-to-head debates or shareable results without interrupting the fan experience.

See sponsor options