Skip to main content
MG01MusicGOAT Index

Classification under review

Iron & Wine

Rank

#776

Score

74.3

Iron & Wine appears in the provisional Music GOAT Index. Ranking scores remain visible while biographical and classification details are under review.

The all-time list excludes unavailable sales and touring evidence. Open Sales & Touring below to see the current evidence status.

MGI model 3.3.0July 2026 · MGI v3.3 archive6 factors counted2 context lenses

GOAT case

Iron & Wine's score is strongest on Current, Public attention, Peak.

Current95.0
Public attention94.0
Peak71.0

Try Catalog + Longevity when you change the scoring.

All-time score74.3

GOAT case

Why the profile matters

The current ranking case for Iron & Wine is represented by the published score components. Classification under review.

Signature era

Classification under review

Classification and editorial arguments are under review.

Sales & touring evidence

Numbers stay hidden until the evidence is ready

We removed the old score-derived ranges. A number returns only after artist-specific inputs, sources, method and review all pass validation.

Commercial scale

Unavailable — insufficient evidence

Withheld

No complete artist-specific observation record exists yet. Missing data is never converted to zero or inferred from rank, score, fame or peer tier.

Not ranked — insufficient evidence

Live scale

Unavailable — insufficient evidence

Withheld

No complete artist-specific observation record exists yet. Missing data is never converted to zero or inferred from rank, score, fame or peer tier.

Not ranked — insufficient evidence

The frozen v3.3 compatibility scores remain in the historical edition, but they are not sales, revenue or box-office facts and cannot unlock a current commercial ranking.

Read the evidence policy

Why here?

Score breakdown

Active All-Time signals

6 count in the score
20% weight
Public attention94.0

Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 1/5 required fields

Source or method: MGI public-attention evidence mapping

Why this number?

derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

20% weight
Influence68.0

Provisional evidence · Editorial judgment · 1/5 required fields

Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz authority evidence

Why this number?

editorial judgment is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

15% weight
Longevity61.0

Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 3/6 required fields

Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz chronology evidence

Why this number?

derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 3/6 required fields are covered and 3 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

15% weight
Catalog52.0

Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 1/6 required fields

Source or method: Wikidata catalog evidence

Why this number?

derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 1/6 required fields are covered and 5 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

15% weight
Current95.0

Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 1/6 required fields

Source or method: Artist expansion metric replacement review

Why this number?

derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 1/6 required fields are covered and 5 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

15% weight
Peak71.0

Provisional evidence · Editorial judgment · 1/5 required fields

Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz authority evidence

Why this number?

editorial judgment is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Context lenses

Not included in this score
Context only

Commercial

Unavailable — insufficient evidence

Needs evidence review · Editorial judgment · 0/7 required fields

Source or method: MGI Ranking Model v3

Why unavailable?

editorial judgment needs review; 0/7 required fields are covered.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Context only

Live

Unavailable — insufficient evidence

Needs evidence review · Editorial judgment · 0/7 required fields

Source or method: MGI Ranking Model v3

Why unavailable?

editorial judgment needs review; 0/7 required fields are covered.

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

GOAT caseWhy Iron & Wine ranks #776All-time list: Public attention, Current, Influence · level from #775 Hildegard von Bingen
All-time listNot counted here: Commercial + LiveUnavailable: Commercial + Live

Iron & Wine lands here because Public attention, Current and Influence do most of the work in this view. Commercial and Live are unavailable until reviewed evidence exists and cannot move this rank.

Iron & Wine is essentially tied with Hildegard von Bingen; the next move would most likely come through Catalog and Longevity. Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed evidence exists; this rank is not recalculated with hidden replacement values.

What helps

Public attention25.3% of this score
Public attention score94.0
Provisional evidenceDerived evidence · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Current19.2% of this score
Current score95.0
Provisional evidenceDerived evidence · 1/6 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 15

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

Influence18.3% of this score
Influence score68.0
Provisional evidenceEditorial judgment · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20

Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.

What could move it

Catalog and Longevity are the softest scoring factors; movement there matters most near Hildegard von Bingen.

More checking on Public attention, Influence and Current would improve confidence before it changes the public score.

Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed observation records pass; no alternate rank is published.

Nearby table context

Ranking neighborhood

Head-to-head

Best comparisons