GOAT case
Why the profile matters
The current ranking case for Tems is represented by the published score components. Classification under review.
Signature era
Classification under review
Classification and editorial arguments are under review.
Classification under review
Tems
Rank
#673
Score
76.6
Tems appears in the provisional Music GOAT Index. Ranking scores remain visible while biographical and classification details are under review.
The all-time list excludes unavailable sales and touring evidence. Open Sales & Touring below to see the current evidence status.
GOAT case
Tems' score is strongest on Influence, Peak, Catalog.
Influence80.0
Peak80.0
Catalog76.0
Try Public attention + Longevity when you change the scoring.
All-time score76.6
Sales & touring evidence
Numbers stay hidden until the evidence is ready
We removed the old score-derived ranges. A number returns only after artist-specific inputs, sources, method and review all pass validation.
Commercial scale
Unavailable — insufficient evidence
No complete artist-specific observation record exists yet. Missing data is never converted to zero or inferred from rank, score, fame or peer tier.
Not ranked — insufficient evidence
Live scale
Unavailable — insufficient evidence
No complete artist-specific observation record exists yet. Missing data is never converted to zero or inferred from rank, score, fame or peer tier.
Not ranked — insufficient evidence
The frozen v3.3 compatibility scores remain in the historical edition, but they are not sales, revenue or box-office facts and cannot unlock a current commercial ranking.
Read the evidence policyWhy here?
Score breakdown
Active All-Time signals
6 count in the score20% weight
Public attention72.0
Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 1/5 required fields
Source or method: MGI public-attention evidence mapping
Why this number?
derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
20% weight
Influence80.0
Provisional evidence · Editorial judgment · 1/5 required fields
Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz authority evidence
Why this number?
editorial judgment is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
15% weight
Longevity76.0
Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 4/6 required fields
Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz chronology evidence
Why this number?
derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 4/6 required fields are covered and 2 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
15% weight
Catalog76.0
Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 4/6 required fields
Source or method: MusicBrainz catalog evidence
Why this number?
derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 4/6 required fields are covered and 2 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
15% weight
Current76.0
Provisional evidence · Derived evidence · 3/6 required fields
Source or method: Wikimedia Pageviews
Why this number?
derived evidence is provisionally mapped; 3/6 required fields are covered and 3 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
15% weight
Peak80.0
Provisional evidence · Editorial judgment · 1/5 required fields
Source or method: Wikidata + MusicBrainz authority evidence
Why this number?
editorial judgment is provisionally mapped; 1/5 required fields are covered and 4 remain open.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
Context lenses
Not included in this scoreContext only
Commercial
Unavailable — insufficient evidence
Needs evidence review · Editorial judgment · 0/7 required fields
Source or method: MGI Ranking Model v3
Why unavailable?
editorial judgment needs review; 0/7 required fields are covered.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
Context only
Live
Unavailable — insufficient evidence
Needs evidence review · Editorial judgment · 0/7 required fields
Source or method: MGI Ranking Model v3
Why unavailable?
editorial judgment needs review; 0/7 required fields are covered.
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
GOAT caseWhy Tems ranks #673All-time list: Influence, Public attention, Peak · level from #672 Hot Chip
All-time listNot counted here: Commercial + LiveUnavailable: Commercial + Live
Tems lands here because Influence, Public attention and Peak do most of the work in this view. Commercial and Live are unavailable until reviewed evidence exists and cannot move this rank.
Tems is essentially tied with Hot Chip; the next move would most likely come through Public attention and Catalog. Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed evidence exists; this rank is not recalculated with hidden replacement values.
What helps
Influence20.9% of this score
Influence score80.0
Provisional evidenceEditorial judgment · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
Public attention18.8% of this score
Public attention score72.0
Provisional evidenceDerived evidence · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 20
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
Peak15.7% of this score
Peak score80.0
Provisional evidenceEditorial judgment · 1/5 fieldsModel confidence highWeight 15
Provisional score retained from the published edition. Supporting narrative is withheld while classification and source context are reviewed.
What could move it
Public attention and Catalog are the softest scoring factors; movement there matters most near Hot Chip.
More checking on Influence, Public attention and Peak would improve confidence before it changes the public score.
Commercial and Live remain unavailable until reviewed observation records pass; no alternate rank is published.
Nearby table context
Ranking neighborhood
Head-to-head
Best comparisons
Keep exploring
Where to go after Tems
Related battle
Tems vs Rauw Alejandro
Main Ranking edge: Rauw Alejandro by 0.2 points, with signal splits keeping the debate alive.
Your picks
Build a GOAT DNA Squad
Pick a 3-8 artist squad and turn taste into a shareable greatness fingerprint.
Debate game
Play GOAT Arena
Pick winners across five high-signal debates and unlock a shareable debate identity.
Broader context
Greatest Artists of All Time
Open the full table and see where every artist lands in Main Ranking.
Custom scoring
Build Your Own Ranking
Move the weights and watch the ranking, biggest movers and head-to-head verdicts change instantly.
How it works
How the GOAT Score Works
See the scoring method, metric weights and labels behind the ranking.